Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.30 seconds)Shri Ashok Kumar And Others vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Others on 1 June, 2016
13. Leaving everything aside, this Court finds that prior to filing
of the petition at hand, petitioners had approached this Court by way of
CWP No.3925 of 2019, titled as Ashok Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of H.P.
& Ors., praying therein for the reliefs:
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Jagdish Chand & Others vs State Of H.P. & Others on 15 May, 2023
Though at one point of time, petitioners in afore case were relieved of
their duties on completion of work, but subsequently pursuant to award
passed by Labour Court, they were reengaged. Though award passed
by Labour Court was laid challenge in this Court by way of CWP
No.1301 of 2005, but during pendency of the same, services of the some
of the labourers were reinstated. Subsequently, such of the persons,
who were not reengaged, filed CWP No.4657 of 2014, titled as Jagdish
Chand & others Vs. State of H.P. & others, wherein direction came to
be issued to the Temple Trust to regularize their services. Pursuant to
directions passed by this Court in afore Civil Writ Petition, Jagdish
Chand as well as other petitioners were reengaged.
Court In The Case Of Secretary, State Of ... vs . Uma on 9 April, 2015
21. Hon'ble Apex Court in much celebrated case of Secretary,
State of Karnataka v. Uma Devi (3) (2006) 4 SCC 1, has laid down
principles governing regularization. Their Lordship held that public
::: Downloaded on - 05/12/2025 20:39:28 :::CIS
-17-
employment must be governed by the constitutional requirements of
Articles 14 and 16, which mandate equality of opportunity. Appointments
cannot be made through backdoor means by engaging temporary or
.
1