Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 29 (0.33 seconds)Section 34 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
The National Highways Act, 1956
Section 34 in The Arbitration Act, 1940 [Entire Act]
The Companies Act, 1956
Mcdermott International Inc vs Burn Standard Co. Ltd. & Ors on 12 May, 2006
In McDermott International Inc. v. Burn Standard Co. Ltd., (2006)
11 SCC 181, it was settled that the Court cannot correct errors of the
47
ARBA No. 43 of 2021 &
Other connected matters
arbitrators. It can only quash the award leaving the parties free to begin
the arbitration again if it is desired, and observed thus :
The Arbitration Act, 1940
Section 37 in The Arbitration Act, 1940 [Entire Act]
I Pay Clearing Services Private Limited vs Icici Bank Limited on 3 January, 2022
In I-Pay Clearing Services (P) Ltd. v. ICICI Bank Ltd., (2022) 3 SCC
121, it was observed that remission of matter to arbitrator under Section
34(4) i.e. for elimination of grounds for setting aside the award cannot
be permitted in absence of findings on the contentious issues, and it was
held that if any findings are recorded ignoring the material evidence on
record, the same are acceptable grounds for setting aside the award
itself. The relevant para 41 of the said judgment is as under :
Dr. Ashok Kumar Maheshwari vs State Of U.P. & Anr on 14 January, 1998
In Ashok Kumar Maheshwari (Dr) v. State of U.P., (1998) 2 SCC
502 : it was observed in para-20 that the basic principle is that the plea
of estoppel cannot be raised to defeat the provisions of a statute.