Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.53 seconds)

Nellaiyappa Pillai vs Thangama Nachiyar And Ors. on 14 December, 1897

6. In such a case, the general trustee of the institution is sufficiently interested in the performance of these charities and in fact it is his duty to see that all these festivals and charities are properly performed. It would be a breach of his duty if he did not do so. In Nellaiyappa Pillai v. Thangama Nachiyar (1897) I.L.R. 21 Mad. 406 : 8 M.L.J. 119, Subrahmaniya Ayyar and Benson, JJ., say this on p. 408:
Madras High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 9 - Full Document

Venkatachala Pillai And Anr. vs The Taluq Board, Saidapet, Represented ... on 9 February, 1911

8. The decision in Venkatachala Pillai v. The Taluq Board, Saidapet (1911) I.L.R. 34 Mad. 375 : 21 M.L.J. 305, relied on by the lower appellate Court has no application to this case. There the only question was whether the provision in a will that butter-milk, betel and nuts, fans and sugar should be given to people attending a festival in a temple was a religious trust or merely a charitable trust. There was 110 feeding to be done in the temple itself. It was held that the trust was not religious in character. This decision has no application to the present case.
Madras High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 13 - Full Document
1