Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.35 seconds)Section 21 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 43 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 37 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
State Of Goa vs M/S Praveen Enterprises on 4 July, 2011
Infact, the decision
rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Goa vs. Praveen
Enterprises referred supra in Paragraph 13 of the said Judgment, the
Hon'ble Supreme Court has categorically stated that “having regard to
Section 43 of the Act, any claim made beyond period of limitation
prescribed by the Limitation Act, 1963 will be barred by limitation and
the Arbitral Tribunal will have to reject such claims as barred by
limitation”. Therefore, from the evidence available on record, the claim
of the Appellant before the Arbitral Tribunal is barred by the Law of
Limitation. Limitation can never be cured and as leniency can be shown
by the counsels even if the claim is a genuine one. The statutory period
of limitation can never be cured and no leniency can be shown by the
Courts, even if the claim is a genuine one.
Section 18 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Section 21 in The Arbitration Act, 1940 [Entire Act]
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
1