Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.21 seconds)Section 17 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 23 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 11 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 16 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
State Of Maharashtra And Anr. vs Rajendra Narayanrao Gaikwad on 20 July, 2007
(i) If the possession of the land under
acquisition is taken under Section 16 of the said
Act i.e. after an award is made by the Collector
under Section 11 therein, the interest would be
payable under Section 34 from the date of passing
of the award and we are in agreement with such a
view expressed by the Division Bench of this
Court (S/Shri N. V. Dabholkar and M. G. Gaikwad,
JJ.) in the case of State of Maharashtra and Anr.
v. Rajendra Narayanrao Gaikwad, reported in
(2008) 1 Bom CR 839.
The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Jafarali Mithabhai Hirani vs The State Of Maharashtra on 24 February, 2009
(viii) We also express our full agreement with
the view taken by the Division Bench of this
Court in Lalitkumar Shah's case, cited supra,
that the decision of the Division Bench in the
case of Jafarali Mithabhai Hirani v. State of
Maharashtra, reported in (2009) 3 All MR 779, and
the similar view taken in other matters is no
longer a good law.
Lalitkumar Himmatlal Shah vs The State Of Maharashtra on 10 May, 2012
(b) We also hold that the decision of the
Division Bench of this Court in the case of
Lalitkumar Himmatlal Shah v. State of
Maharashtra, decided by Smt. Vasanti A. Naik and
Shri Prasanna B. Varale, JJ., and reported in
(2012) 4 Mah LJ 742, lays down a correct position
of law and it does not require reconsideration."
Section 4 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
1