Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.23 seconds)

Y. Suresh Babu vs State Of A.P. And Anr. on 29 April, 1987

In fact one of the decisions, in Y. Suresh Babu v. State of A.P. (2005) 1 SCC 347), clearly shows that the same should not be treated as a precedent. The fact that constitutional courts in exceptional Crl.R.P.No. 2367 of 2005 6 cases have invoked the extra ordinary powers vested in them under Section 482 Cr.P.C. or Articles 226, 227, 32, 141 or 142 of the Constitution in aid of justice to enable persons to bring the proceedings before the criminal court to a premature termination or that criminal courts while exercising original, appellate or revisional powers have or have been permitted to take note of the composition of the non-compoundable offences by the victim while exercising the sentencing discretion cannot lead one to the conclusion that all criminal courts can hereafter permit composition of non-compoundable offences ignoring the mandate of S. 320 Cr.P.C. Such an approach is bound to create confusion.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 265 - A P Sen - Full Document
1   2 Next