Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.33 seconds)Section 7 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Maharashtra Court-fees Act.
Section 2 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
The Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977
Section 173 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
M.R. Kulkarni And Ors. vs Bank Of Maharashtra, Nationalised Bank ... on 13 February, 2004
2. The issue involved in these revisions is as to whether
appellants, who are neither insurer, nor owner in appeal for
enhancement preferred against judgment and award of the
claims tribunal passed U/Sec. 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act
(hereafter referred as to the 'M. V. Act' for the sake of brevity
and convenience) can restrict the value or claim for payment
of lessor court fees at the time of filing of appeal.
Dattatraya Govind Mahajan & Ors. Etc vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr on 27 January, 1977
924.CRA-106-2025 & Ors.odt
therefore reliance on the said judgment is totally misplaced.
The purport and the scheme of payment of Court fees under
Section 7(2) of the Act is altogether different. The reliance
placed by the Taxing Officer on paragraph no.10 of the
judgment, is thoroughly misconceived. The explanation
appended to sub-clause (i) and (ii) of Section 7(2) is totally loss
sight of.
Nagappa vs Gurudayal Singh & Ors on 3 December, 2002
A Nagappa Vs. Gurudayal Singh and others reported in
(2003) 2 SCC 274.
M/S. Afcons Infra. Ltd. & Anr vs M/S Cherian Varkey Constn Co.P.Ltd.& ... on 26 July, 2010
a. Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. and another Vs. Cherian
Varkey Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. and others (2010) 8
SCC 24 for the purpose of statutory interpretation, principles
are laid down in para Nos. 20 to 21.6 by the Supreme Court,
which are as follows :