Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 32 (0.33 seconds)

Kalyan Vihar Buildhome Pvt. Ltd., ... vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-6-1, Jaipur on 29 October, 2019

13. In the present case, where the date of agreement to sell in respect of the two flats is 9.4.2007, which is much prior to the financial year relevant to assessment year 2014-15 when the provisions of section 43CA have become effective, there is no way the assessee would have foreseen these provisions at the time of entering into the agreement to sell that it has to receive the consideration only by any mode other than cash. At the relevant point in time when it had entered into agreement to sell, there was no such requirement of receiving the whole of the consideration in mode other than cash. Therefore, in order to make the provisions of sub-section (4) workable, in our view, the provisions of sub-section (4) would be applicable in respect of agreement to 14 ITA No. 752 & 753/JPR/2023 Shri Krishnaraj Buildhome Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO sell for transfer of an asset which has been executed on or after 1st April, 2013 and thus, not applicable in the instant case."
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Jaipur Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Principal Commissioner Of Income ... vs Sunil Kumar Agarwal Huf on 29 August, 2022

Conclusion From the detailed submissions made above, the Hon'ble Tribunal would kindly appreciate that the Learned Assessing Officer erred in making the impugned addition of Rs. 1,26,87,868/- by invoking the provisions of Section 43 CA of the IT Act, 1961 and the ld CIT(A) grossly erred in sustaining the addition, ignoring the facts that the date of agreement for sale of the immovable property is 10/09/2008, which is much prior to the Assessment Year 2014-15, when the provisions of Sec. 43CA have become effective and, as such, the assessee would not have foreseen these provisions at the time of executing agreement to sell that it has to receive the sale consideration by any other mode other than cash before the date of agreement. The provisions of Sec. 43CA being pari materia the provisions of Sec. 50 C of the IT Act, 1961 the Learned Assessing Officer, being a quasi judicial authority, was duty bound to refer the matter to valuation cell as held by the Hon'ble Kolkata High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Sunil Kumar Agarwal (supra). The Learned Assessing Officer as well as the Learned CIT(A) failed to appreciate the fact that 90% of the sale consideration was received by the assessee within just five days from the execution of agreement on 10/09/2008 and such delay being negligible, the benefit of provisions of Sec. 43CA(d) & (4) should not have been denied to the assessee. the Learned CIT(A) has grossly erred in not considering the detailed submission filed by the assessee during the course of appellate proceedings and in not passing a speaking and well-reasoned order, dealing with the grounds , submissions and case laws cited by the assessee. The Hon'ble Tribunal is, therefore, humbly requested to consider the facts of the case, submission made and case laws cited by the assessee and delete the addition made by the Learned Assessing Officer and sustained by the Learned CIT(A).
Calcutta High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 1 - T S Sivagnanam - Full Document

M/S. Shri Satyanandji Tradecom P. Ltd., ... vs Dcit, Cc-7(2), Mumbai on 25 February, 2022

Indexone Tradecone (P) Ltd Vs. DCIT (2018) 172 ITD 396 (ITAT Jaipur) "The provisions of section 43CA have been inserted by the Finance Act, 2013 w.e.f 01.04.2014 relevant to assessment year 2014-15 and if 39 ITA No. 752 & 753/JPR/2023 Shri Krishnaraj Buildhome Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO we look at the provisions of sub-section (3) and sub-section (4), it emphasizes a scenario where the date of agreement fixing value of consideration for transfer of the assets and date of registration are not the same and provides that the value as on the date of agreement would be considered provided the amount of consideration or part thereof has been received by any mode other than cash on or before the date of agreement for transfer of the assets.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next