Kirpal Singh vs State Of Haryana on 10 May, 1999
3. Mrs.
Bhatt learned advocate for the appellant has vehemently argued that
the learned Judge has not considered the provisions of law and the
order of the learned Judge is bad in eye of law and looking to the
provisions of sec. 276B of the Act, learned Judge cannot award such
lesser sentence. She has also placed reliance on the decision of the
Supreme Court in the case of Kirpal Singh vs. State of Haryana,
reported in (1999)5 SCC 649 and submitted that the impugned
order requires to be quashed and set aside and the opponents no. 1 to
3 be convicted and sentenced as per the provisions of law.