Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.20 seconds)Section 23 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 24 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Section 18 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 6 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
The Special Land Acquisition Officer, ... vs T. Adinarayan Setty on 7 November, 1958
The general principles for determining compensation have,
been set out in sections 23 & 24 of the Act. The
compensation payable to the owner of the land is the market
value which is determined by reference to the price which a
seller might reasonably expect to obtain from a willing
purchaser, bat as this may not be possible to ascertain with
any amount of precision, the authority charged with the
duty to award compensation is bound to
212
make an estimate judged by an objective standard. The land acqui
red has, therefore, to be valued not only with
reference to its condition at the time of the declaration
under section 4 of the Act but its potential value also must
be taken into account. The sale-deeds of the lands situated
in the vicinity and the comparable benefits and advantages
which they have, furnish a rough and ready method of
computing the market value. This, however, is not the only
method. The rent which an owner was actually receiving at
the relevant point of time or the rent which the
neighbouring lands of similar nature are fetching can be
taken into account by capitalising the rent which according
to the present prevailing rate of interest is 20 times the
annual rent. But this also is not a conclusive method.This
Court had in Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bangalore v.
T. Adinarayan Setty(1), indicated at page 412 the methods of
valuation to be adopted in ascertaining the market value of
the land on the date of the notificatioa under section 4(1)
which are : (i) opinion of experts, (ii) the price paid
within a reasonable time in bona fide transactions of
purchase ,of the lands acquired or the lands adjacent to the
lands acquired and possessing similar advantages; and (iii)
a number of years' purchase of the actual or immediately
prospective profits of the lands acquired. These methods,
however, do not preclude the Court from taking any other
special circumstances into consideration, the requirement
being always to arrive as near as possible an estimate of
the market value. In arriving to a reasonably correct
market value, it may be necessary to take even two or all of
those methods into account inasmuch as the exact valuation
is not always possible as no two lands may be the same
either in respect of the situation or the extent or the
potentially nor is it possible in all cases to have reliable
material from which that valuation can be accurately
determined.
1