Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.40 seconds)Section 24 in Gold (Control) Act, 1968 [Entire Act]
Gold (Control) Act, 1968
The Trade Marks Act, 1999
Section 9 in Gold (Control) Act, 1968 [Entire Act]
Zenith Colour Trading Co. vs Taherally Esufally Rangwala on 25 July, 1955
The learned Advocate for the petitioners was not able to show what other legal proceedings for rectification of the register of trade marks other than suit could be initiated apart from the one under Section 46 of the Old Act. This is a clear indication that proceedings like the present one are legal proceedings. The use of the words ' all proceedings under this Act before a High Court' in Section 74-A of the Old Act cannot lead to any inference that the proceedings before a High Court are not legal proceedings. Proceedings before the High Court for rectification of the register are treated in English Law as legal proceedings and there is nothing in the provisions of the Trade Marks Act of 1940 to hold that the Indian Legislature intended that the proceedings before the High Court in respect of applications under Section 46 of the Old Act should not be deemed to be legal proceedings. For the foregoing reasons I prefer the view expressed in Zenith Colour Trading Co. v. Taherally 58 Bom. L.R. 912 and In the matter of Om Parkash A.I.R. 1956 Punj.