Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.24 seconds)Confederation Of Ex-Servicemen ... vs Union Of India & Ors on 22 August, 2006
(b) Confederation of Ex-Servicemen Associations v. Union of
India, (2006) 8 SCC 399. This was however, in connection with the
challenge as to whether there should be no one time payment at all by the
Ex Servicemen for their medical treatment and should the government
bear the full amount.)
J.W.O. B.K. Singh vs Union Of India And Ors. on 11 August, 2000
(e) In K.B. Singh vs Union of India (2001) 10 SCC 1678, the
observation of the Apex Court is as under :-
State Of Karnataka And Another vs Sri R. Vivekananda Swamy on 1 April, 2008
(f) In the case of State of Karnataka v. R. Vivekananda Swamy,
(2008) 5 SCC 328, the Apex Court has held as under :-
Bishan Singh, Gurdial Singh, Hardial ... vs The State Of Punjab on 9 August, 1973
In the above case as well, the Apex Court approved
provisions of relaxation in the Rules and in fact the Apex Court
under the facts and circumstances of that case as well as another
case of Rajasthan, invoked the provisions of Art. 142 of the
constitution.
Basavaiah vs H.L. Ramesh & Ors on 29 July, 2010
In this regard, reference could be invited to the case of Basavaiah
(Dr) vs Dr. H.L. Ramesh (2010) 8 SCC 372, wherein the Apex Court has held as
under:-
Article 47 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
State Of Punjab & Ors vs Ram Lubhaya Bagga Etc. Etc on 26 February, 1998
(a) State of Punjab v. Ram Lubhaya Bagga, (1998) 4 SCC 117,
wherein the Apex Court has held as under :-
Article 142 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
1