Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.30 seconds)Section 28AA in The Customs Act, 1962 [Entire Act]
Section 5 in The Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [Entire Act]
State Of Tamil Nadu vs Pyare Lal Malhotra Etc on 19 January, 1976
9|Page C/10049/2022 -DB
instances. (See State of T.N. v. PyareLal Malhotra [1976 (1) SCC 834],
Mahindra Engineering and Chemical Products Ltd. v. Union of India [1992
(1) SCC 727]; SaitRikhajiFurtarnal v. State of A.P. [1991 Supp (1) SCC 202];
Mahindra Engineering And Chemical ... vs Union Of India And Ors on 21 January, 1992
9|Page C/10049/2022 -DB
instances. (See State of T.N. v. PyareLal Malhotra [1976 (1) SCC 834],
Mahindra Engineering and Chemical Products Ltd. v. Union of India [1992
(1) SCC 727]; SaitRikhajiFurtarnal v. State of A.P. [1991 Supp (1) SCC 202];
R. Dalmia vs C.I.T., Delhi, New Delhi on 21 September, 1977
and R. Dalmia v. C.I.T. [1977 (2) SCC 467].
Section 28 in The Customs Act, 1962 [Entire Act]
Commissioner Of Sales Tax, Madhya ... vs M/S Popular Trading Company, Ujjain on 5 April, 2000
17.The expression "that is to say" is descriptive, enumerative and
exhaustive and circumscribes to a great extent the scope of the entry. (See
Commissioner of Sales Tax, M.P. v. Popular Trading Company, Ujjain [2000
(5) SCC 511]."
1