Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 34 (0.23 seconds)Section 164 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 25 in The Arms Act, 1959 [Entire Act]
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 27 in The Arms Act, 1959 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Arms Act, 1959
State Of Punjab vs Jugraj Singh & Ors on 14 February, 2002
26. However, in State of Punjab v. Jugraj Singh,
(2002) 3 SCC 234 (AIR 2002 SC 1083), this
Court opined that when there are convincing
evidence of eye-witnesses, non-examination of
17
2025:CHC-AS:2039-DB
the expert would not affect the creditworthiness
of the version put forth by the eyewitnesses."
Darshan Singh vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 15 January, 2010
In Darshan Singh Vs. State of Punjab reported in (2024) 3 SCC
164 the issue of omission and contradiction in the statement of the eye
witness recorded under Section 161 of Cr.P.C. has been dealt with. In this
regard the paragraph 31 of the said judgment is quoted herein below:-
Pankaj vs State Of Rajasthan on 9 September, 2016
In Pankaj Vs. State of Rajasthan reported in JT 2016 (9) SC 93 the
Hon'ble Apex Court has specifically held that it is a well settled principle of
law that when the genesis and the manner of the incident is doubtful, the
accused cannot be convicted. Paragraph 13 of the said judgment is quoted
herein below:-