Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.18 seconds)

Shimbhu Singh & Ors vs State Of Rajasthan & Anr on 29 January, 2018

In Shimbhu Singh vs. State of Rajasthan (supra), a petition under section 482 CrPC was filed after the decision of the High Court in the criminal appeal and, therefore, the Division Bench has held that after final decision in the appeal, the petition under section 482 CrPC with a prayer for issuing directions to run different sentences concurrently is not maintainable as this Court has become functus officio. However, in the present case, a criminal revision petition filed by the petitioner against the judgment of appellate court is pending consideration before this Court and has not yet been decided, and in respect of two other cases, no appeal or revision is filed by the petitioner before this Court. Hence, it cannot be said that this Court has become functus officio. As such the above referred judgment has no applicability.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 1 - Cited by 10 - Full Document

Sanjay Kumar Purohit & Ors vs State Of Raj. & Ors on 15 January, 2009

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the present case, offence involved, sentences awarded, period of detention of the petitioner as on date and in view of the decision of this Court rendered in Rajender vs. State of Rajasthan (supra), I am of the considered view that ends of justice would be met if the petitioner is 7 granted benefit of section 427 of the CrPC and in my opinion, it would not be inconsistent with the administration of criminal justice.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 4 - Cited by 1827 - P C Tatia - Full Document
1