Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.25 seconds)The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Section 100 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Ramchandra Sheshgiri Kamath vs Janardan Vishwanath Hegde on 15 November, 1967
In my view, the judgment of Division Bench of this Court in
case of Vanmalal Manoharrao Kamdi and Ors. (supra), judgment of
this Court in case of Babu Bhagwan Din (supra) and judgment of this
Court in case of Ramchandra S. Kamath (supra) would not apply to
the facts of this case in view of the fact that the orders passed by the
Joint Charity Commissioner being a common order under Sections 41-
A and 41-E, is upheld by this Court and by Supreme Court.
Ramanna Amannappa Masare (Since ... vs Bhanudas Dagadu Patange And Ors on 21 December, 2016
In my view, the said judgment of this Court in the said second
appeal was binding not only on the Patanges and the respondents
herein but also the appellants who had agitated their rights not only
before the Trial Court, First Appellate Court but also before this Court
in the second appeal.
Section 47 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
The Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950
Church Of North Of India vs Lavajibhai Ratanjibhai & Ors on 3 May, 2005
19. It is submitted by the learned senior counsel that the First
Appellate Court has misinterpreted the judgment of Supreme Court in
case of Church of North India vs. Lavajibhai Ratanjibhai and Ors.,
2005(10) SCC 760. He submits that the subject matter in the
proceedings before the learned Joint Charity Commissioner was not
relating to the trust or the property or income of the trust but was
regarding the personal income of the predecessor of the appellants and
thus the suit filed by him was for enforcement of the civil right and
was thus maintainable.
Smt. Vanmala Manoharrao Kamdi vs The Deputy Charity Commissioner on 4 May, 2012
In my view, the judgment of Division Bench of this Court in
case of Vanmalal Manoharrao Kamdi and Ors. (supra), judgment of
this Court in case of Babu Bhagwan Din (supra) and judgment of this
Court in case of Ramchandra S. Kamath (supra) would not apply to
the facts of this case in view of the fact that the orders passed by the
Joint Charity Commissioner being a common order under Sections 41-
A and 41-E, is upheld by this Court and by Supreme Court.
1