Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.27 seconds)Section 397 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Coinage Act, 2011
Section 139 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Amar Nath And Others vs State Of Haryana & Others on 29 July, 1977
2025.09.12
17:36:01
+0530
is duly applicable to the order passed u/s 143A of The Act as the order
dated 02.12.2024, if reversed would have the effect of terminating the
proceedings (qua interim compensation) u/s 143A of The Act. Hence,
considering the law laid down by the Apex Court and various High
Courts, this court is of the view that the order passed u/s 143A of The
Act is not an interlocutory order and revision petition against such an
order is maintainable. Accordingly, the present revision petitions are
held to be maintainable.
Girish Kumar Suneja vs Cbi on 13 July, 2017
8. The Apex Court in the case of Girish Kumar Suneja vs CBI,
AIR 2017 SC 3620, while dealing with interlocutory orders observed
that there are three categories of orders that a court can pass- final,
intermediate and interlocutory. It further observed that revision
jurisdiction can be exercised in respect of a final order and qua an
intermediate order. The Apex Court explained that an intermediate order
is one which is interlocutory in nature but when reversed it has the effect
M/s Samyak Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s Nishi Exports Pvt. Ltd. 5 of 14
Digitally
signed by
ANURAG
ANURAG THAKUR
THAKUR Date:
Amit Kapoor vs Ramesh Chander & Anr on 13 September, 2012
12. Regarding the scope of criminal revision and exercise of
jurisdiction in a revision, the Apex Court in the case of Amit Kapoor vs
Ramesh Chander & Anr., AIR Online 2012 SC 668, observed as
follows:-
Section 138 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
1. M S Jsb Cargo And Freight Forwarder ... vs 1. State & Anr. on 20 December, 2021
13. The object of NI Act (Amendment) Act, 2018 (whereby
section 143A was inserted into The Act) was to provide relief to genuine
complainants during the pendency of the cheque dishonour case, so that
they are not left waiting for years on account of undue delays and
dilatory tactics of the accused (See M/s. JSB Cargo & Freight
Forwarders Pvt. Ltd. Vs State & Anr., 2022 (296) DLT 250).