Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 34 (0.41 seconds)Section 34 in The Arbitration Act, 1940 [Entire Act]
Section 3A in The National Highways Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
The Land Acquisition Officer, ... vs Nookala Rajamallu And Ors. on 21 November, 2003
-17- 2024:HHC:8730
The Court made a reference to two other cases,
viz., Hasanali Khanbhai & Sons Vs. State of Gujarat 15
and Land Acquisition Officer Vs. Nookala Rajamallu 16,
where, the deduction by way development charges,
was held permissible.
M/S Dyna Technologies Pvt.Ltd. vs M/S Crompton Greaves Ltd. on 18 December, 2019
See
also: Dyna Technologies Pvt Ltd v. Crompton Greaves Limited (2019) 20 SCC 1, para 24, 25.
Uhl Power Company Ltd. vs The State Of Himachal Pradesh Multi ... on 7 January, 2022
47. This view has been referred to with approval by
a bench of three learned Judges in UHL Power
Company Ltd v. State of Himachal Pradesh 36. In respect
of Section 37, this court observed:-
Section 34 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
The Arbitration Act, 1940
Smt. Kaushalya Devi Bogra And Others Etc vs The Land Acquisition Officer, ... on 15 February, 1984
-13- 2024:HHC:8730
Raj Taneja v. State of M.P.6 and Kausalya
Devi Bogra v. Land Acquisition Officer7 .