Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.20 seconds)

Satyawati Sharma (Dead) By Lrs vs Union Of India & Another on 16 April, 2008

23. ISSUE NO. 3 : Relief ­ In view of foregoing discussion, LRs of petitioner is held entitled to the following reliefs:­ i. Compensation @ Rs. 21,00,000/­ per acre i.e. an increase of Rs.7,18,000/­ per acre in respect of the land as mentioned in para 7 herein above. ii. Additional amount @ 12% per annum under Section 23(1A) of The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 from the date of notification under Section 4 9 of 10 LAC no. 119/14 Ved Prakash (deceased) through LRs v UOI & Another Village Dhool Siras Award No.27/2002­03 of the Act till the date of taking over of possession.
Supreme Court of India Cites 77 - Cited by 1265 - G S Singhvi - Full Document

Impulse India P.Ltd. vs Union Of India on 23 January, 2014

20. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has already considered the evidence and material in case of Impulse India Pvt Ltd (supra) regarding fixation of market value. No evidence showing that the land of petitioner is better than the land involved in the case of 'Impulse India Pvt. Ltd.' has been brought on record by the petitioner. Similarly, no evidence showing that the land of petitioner is inferior in any aspect than the land referred to in case of 'Impulse India Pvt. Ltd.' has been adduced by the respondents.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 42 - Full Document
1   2 Next