Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.28 seconds)
Bharath Auto Cars (P) Ltd vs Henri D Souza on 6 January, 2026 cites

Cci Chambers Co-Op. Hsg. Society Ltd vs Development Credit Bank Ltd on 29 August, 2003

17. Further, it is also well-settled legal position [CCI Chambers Coop. Hsg. Society Ltd. v. Development Credit Bank Ltd., (2003) 7 SCC 233] that requirement of leading detailed evidence could not be a ground to shut the doors of any forum created under the Act like the Consumer Protection Act. The anvil on which entertainability of a complaint by a forum under the Act is to be determined, is whether the questions, though complicated they may be, are capable of being determined by summary enquiry."
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 497 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

Maruti Udyog Limited vs Hasmukh Lakshmichand on 26 May, 2009

16. It is also pertinent to mention here that in an order passed by the NCDRC in the case of Maruti Udyog Limited v. Hasmukh Lakshmichand6, which order has been relied upon by the NCDRC in the present case, the question which fell for consideration in that Revision Petition was - as to whether there was any "manufacturing defect" in the car or not? The NCDRC noted that the onus to prove the defect is on the complainant. Section 13(1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 was referred which provided that if a complainant alleges a defect in the goods which cannot be determined without proper analysis or test of the goods, the District Forum shall obtain sample of the goods from the complainant, seal it and 5 (2023) 7 SCC 775 6 2009 SCC OnLine NCDRC 74
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 1 - Cited by 30 - Full Document
1