Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.52 seconds)
K. Karthikeyan vs The Kerala State Road Transport ... on 11 March, 2022 cites

K.U.Kunju Mohammed vs The Kerala State Road Transport ... on 3 August, 1993

In view of the same, I feel that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the decision in Kunju Muhammed's case, supra, and the petitioner is not entitled to the relief sought for. There is yet another aspect of the matter. The present claim by the petitioner for counting his prior service in GREF for calculating the qualifying service for pension was made almost after 17 years after his retirement in 2000, and therefore, the claim if any cannot be agitated at this length of time as the same is hit by delay and laches.
Kerala High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

State Of Kerala And Ors. Etc. vs P. Haridasan And Ors. Etc. Etc. on 8 February, 2016

4. The petitioner contended that there is absolutely no reason to reject his claim as per Exhibit P2 and that the petitioner is entitled to WP(C) No.17217 of 2018 4 count the period of service for reckoning the length of service for calculating the retirement benefits. Petitioner relies on the judgment of the full bench of this Court in State of Kerala and Others v. P. Haridasan and others, 2015 KHC 159 to contend for the position that his prior service in Central Government is to be counted as qualifying service for the purpose of pension. After going through the judgment relied on by the petitioner, I feel that the same is not applicable in the facts of this case in as much as in that case the issue involved was regarding the counting of prior Central Government service to the service of an aided college teacher and in the case of teachers, the statute itself specifically mandates that provisions of the Kerala Service Rules shall mutatis mutandis apply to teachers in the private aided colleges. The question to be decided in this case is as to whether the Government Order permitting reckoning of prior service in GREF as qualifying service for the purpose of pension is applicable to the employees of the respondent Corporation.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1