Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.26 seconds)
Mansoor Alam & Ors vs Nasseeruddin Khan & Ors on 3 September, 2008 cites

Merla Ramanna vs Nallaparaju And Others on 4 November, 1955

Apart from the aforementioned ratio laid down by the Apex Court and followed by this Court, it has to be taken note of that when an explanation in section 37 was added by insertion by the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1976 with effect from 1.2.1977 any and every doubt with regard to lack of territorial jurisdiction for the court at Gaya which had passed the decree would stand automatically repelled. In fact the objects and reasons of the amendment in section 37 was to tide over some sort of a conflict of decisions of different high courts on the point of jurisdiction over the subject matter of a decree when it is transferred to another court. In this context Clause 18 laying down objects and 13 reasons for amendment needs to be gone into as was originally incorporated in the statement of objects and reasons (Bill) of the Gazette of India, Ext., dated 8.4.1974, Part II, S.2, P.303, which reads as follows:
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 90 - Full Document
1