Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 21 (0.26 seconds)

Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Shri Barkate Saifiyah Society on 3 November, 1993

7.2 Even if one has to go by the observation of AO in the assessment order that assessee is a mixed trust, even then clause 13(1)(b) cannot be applied as it is applicable to purely charitable trust as held by Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of CIT vs. Barkate Saifiyah Society(supra). The relevant observations have already been reproduced in the earlier part of this order in para 6.1. Therefore, also benefit of exemption under section 11 cannot be denied to the assessee under section 13(1)(b) of the Act.
Gujarat High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 28 - M B Shah - Full Document

Ahmedabad Rana Caste Association vs Commissioner Of Income Tax, Gujarat on 16 September, 1971

He submitted that Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ahamadabad Rana Caste Association vs. CIT, 82 ITR 704 (SC) have approved the decision of Privy Counsel in the case of Oppenheim v. Tobacco Securities Trust Co. Ltd., wherein it has been held that a group of person may be numerous , but, if the nexus between them is their personal relationship to a single propsitus or to several propositi, they are neither the community nor a section of the community for charitable purposes.(sic). Referring to the same their Lordship have observed that it is unable to comprehend that how the trust of Rana Caste started in Ahmedabad can be regarded as having been introduced in the caste by consideration of their personal status as individual. He submitted that though religious activity has been stated as one of the object in the memorandum of Trust, but in fact during the year under consideration the assessee has incurred major expenses only in respect of peace conference which cannot be described as religious activity alone. He in this regard 13 ITA NO.6069/MUM/2011(A.Y. 2008-09) referred to the observations of Ld. CIT(A) vide which it was mentioned that the peace conference was attended by the dignitaries of all the religions prevailing in India. Further supporting his case, to contend that section 13(1)(b) would be applicable only to charitable trust, apart from relying upon the aforementioned decision of Hon'ble Gujarat High Court Ld. AR relied upon ghe following decisions:
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 86 - A N Grover - Full Document

Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Shri Krishen Chand Charitable Trust on 17 June, 1974

1. CIT vs. Chandra Charitable Trust, 294 ITR 86(Guj) , wherein it has been held that Jainism was accepted to be a religion, from the covenants of the trust deed it could be spelt out that not only to propagate Jainism or help or assist maintenance of temple, Sadhus, Sadhvis, etc. yet other goals were set in the trust deed. The trust would then become a charitable trust and also a religious trust or it could be addressed as a charitable religious trust, and if that be so section 13(1)(b) would not be applicable.
Jammu & Kashmir High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 43 - S M Ali - Full Document

Nirmal Agricultural Society vs Income-Tax Officer on 28 December, 1998

7.4 There is also force in the contention of Ld. AR that entire gross income could not be assessed as income of the assessee as in case it is held that trust is not eligible for exemption under section 11, then net income should be assessed and such arguments is supported by decision relied by the Ld. AR in the case of Nirmal Agricultural Society (supra) and no contrary decision has been brought to our notice.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 0 - Cited by 32 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next