Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.22 seconds)Section 16G in Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 [Entire Act]
Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921
Section 2 in Orissa Education Act, 1969 [Entire Act]
Jaisri Sahu vs Rajdewan Dubey And Others on 28 April, 1961
11. It was approved by the Apex Court in Jaisri Sahu v. Rajdewan Dubey and Ors., AIR 1962 SC 83.
Daya Shankar Tiwari vs Principal, Smt. Ramwanti Devi, Beni ... on 6 November, 1997
12. The next question is whether the management could dismiss a class IV employee without obtaining prior approval of the DIOS as provided in Chapter III, Regulation 31. Counsel for the petitioners argued that no prior approval of DIOS was required for dismissing a class IV employee. On the other hand Counsel for the respondent No. 2 urged that prior approval of DIOS was necessary. In the alternative the learned Counsel urged that in cases where prior approval of DIOS has not been obtained the class IV employee could prefer appeal before the management and representation before the DIOS. The argument is supported by a Single Judge decision of this Court in Daya Shanker Tiwari v. Principal R.D.BM. Uchchatar Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Neogaon, Mirzapur and Ors., 1998 (I) ESC 403 (All). The learned Single Judge held that the provisions of Regulation 31 read with Section 16-G (1) were applicable before dismissing a class IV employee, And prior approval of Inspector or Regional Inspectrcss was required to be obtained by the management.
Principal, Rastriya Inter College, ... vs District Inspector Of Schools, ... on 4 February, 2000
This decision was approved by a Division Bench of this Court in Principal, Rastriya Inter College, Bali Nichlaul, District Maharajganj and Ors. v. District Inspector of Schools, Mahrajganj and Ors., (2000) 1 UPLBEC 707. Therefore, since prior approval of DIOS was not obtained by the petitioners before dismissing the respondent No. 2, the DIOS rightly set aside the dismissal order.
Yunus Ali Sha vs Mohamed Abdul Kalam & Ors on 9 April, 1999
4. The first question is whether in view of Yumis Ali Sha (supra) and Raj Kumar Shukta (supra) the provisions of the Act and Regulations are not applicable as the petitioners is a minority institution.
Bihar Education Code, 1961
Smt. J.K. Kalra vs Regional Inspectress Of Girls Schools, ... on 19 July, 1996
As stated earlier, I am in respectful agreement with the law laid down by the Full Bench decision in. J.T. Kalra (supra).