Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.23 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 136 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 5 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 10 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Yoginath D. Bagde vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr on 16 September, 1999
(9) The case is one of No Evidence. Mr. Joshi, in support
of his submissions, has placed reliance on the decision of
Page 33 of 49
C/LPA/185/2017 CAV JUDGMENT
the Supreme Court in the case Yoginath D. Bagde vs.
State of Maharashtra [AIR 1999 SC 3734] and the
decision of this Court in the case of T.P. Viradiya vs.
State of Gujarat [Special Civil Application
No.16957 of 2014 decided on 4th July 2016].
Section 19 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Chairman Lic Of India & Ors vs A Masilamani on 23 November, 2012
8. Ms. Vishen relied on a decision in the case of Chairman,
Life Insurance Corporation of India and Others vs. A.
Masilamani reported in (2013) 6 SCC 530. Emphasis was
made to paragraphs no. 16 to 22 of the judgement. According
to Ms. Vishen, as held by the Supreme Court, it is a settled
legal proposition that once the Court sets aside an order of
punishment on the ground that the inquiry was not properly
conducted the Court cannot reinstate an employee. It must
remit the case concerned to the disciplinary authority for it to
conduct the inquiry from the point that it stood vitiated.
According to Ms. Vishen, therefore, what the learned Single
Judge had done was just and proper.
Section 3 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
1