Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.58 seconds)The Central Sales Tax Act, 1956
Article 2 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 34 in The Arbitration Act, 1940 [Entire Act]
Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. vs Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. on 9 September, 2021
In Delhi Airport Metro Express Private Limited vs. Delhi Metro
Rail Corporation Limited, 2022 1 SCC 131, the Hon'ble Supreme Court
held as under:
Associate Builders vs Delhi Development Authority on 25 November, 2014
30. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has in the case of Associate Builders
v. DDA (2015) 3 SCC 49 held that findings on merits are within the
domain of the arbitral tribunal and courts exercising jurisdiction under
Section 34 of the Act do not act as courts of appeal. The arbitrator is the
ultimate master of the quantity and quality of evidence before him.
Findings on merits, even if based on little evidence or evidence which
does not measure up to the legally trained mind, cannot be interfered with
by courts under Section 34 of the Act. It is submitted that the award is
unanimous and does not suffer from any patent illegality. Therefore, this
Court may not interfere in the impugned award.
Section 37 in The Arbitration Act, 1940 [Entire Act]
Section 6 in The Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 28 in The Arbitration Act, 1940 [Entire Act]
Uhl Power Company Ltd. vs The State Of Himachal Pradesh Multi ... on 7 January, 2022
In UHL Power Company Limited vs. State of Himachal Pradesh,
2022 4 SCC 116, the Hon'ble Supreme Court reiterated the narrow scope
under Section 34 of the Act and held as under: