Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.18 seconds)Section 25 in The Payment And Settlement Systems Act, 2007 [Entire Act]
A.C. Narayanan vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr on 13 September, 2013
(2) The Hon'ble Supreme Court in A. C. Narayanan Vs. State of
Maharashtra & Anr." (2014) 11 SCC 790, has given discretion to the Magistrate to rely
on the complaint, documents annexed and the affidavit submitted by complainant in
deciding whether or not to issue process. u/s. 200 CrPC and it is not mandatory to
examine upon oath the complainant or its witnesses in order to decide the same. Upon
considering the instant complaint, documents produced and verification in the form of
affidavit of evidence, there are sufficient grounds for proceeding further against accused
for offence punishable under Section 25 of Payments and Settlements System Act, 2007
r/w Section 138 NI Act. Accused is prima facie responsible, being the drawer of the
NACH Mandate/ECS in dispute.
Section 202 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 65 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Damodar S.Prabhu vs Sayed Babalal H on 3 May, 2010
(4) As per the guidelines laid down in Damodar S. Prabhu Vs. Sayed
Babalal H, AIR 2010 (SC) 1907, Ahlmad is directed to make a mention on the summons
issued against the accused (by adding separate sheet, if required) that "accused can make
an application for compounding of the offence at the first and second hearing of the case
and if such an application is made, compounding may be allowed by the Court without
imposing any costs on the accused."
1