Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.19 seconds)Praduman Kumar vs Virendra Goyal (Dead) By L. Rs on 11 March, 1969
In AIR 1946 All 328, (Habib Ahmad v. Keoti Kuer) it has been held that the payment or tender cannot be made in the appellate Court under Section 114 of the Transfer of Property Act and in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court , (Praduman Kumar v. Virendra Goyal) we do not think that the Allahabad High Court's decision reported in AIR 1946 All 328, (Habib Ahmed v. Keoti Kuer) can be stated to be correctly decided.
The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882
Bhagwant Rambhau Khese vs Ramchandra Kesho Pathak on 13 March, 1952
In , (Bhagwant v. Ramchandra) what the Bombay High Court held is clearly distinguishable in the facts of the present case. It has been held by the Bombay High Court in paragraph 11 as follows :--
Ahmad Husain vs Riaz Ahmad And Ors. on 29 June, 1914
We respectfully follow the reasons of the Hon'ble single Judge of the Allahabad High Court which held in 25 IC 186 = (AIR 1914 All 411), (Ahmad Hussain v. Riaz Ahmad) as follows :--
Habib Ahmed vs Mt. Keoti Kuer on 12 September, 1945
In AIR 1946 All 328, (Habib Ahmad v. Keoti Kuer) it has been held that the payment or tender cannot be made in the appellate Court under Section 114 of the Transfer of Property Act and in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court , (Praduman Kumar v. Virendra Goyal) we do not think that the Allahabad High Court's decision reported in AIR 1946 All 328, (Habib Ahmed v. Keoti Kuer) can be stated to be correctly decided.
Section 76 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 115 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
1