Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 32 (1.56 seconds)
Eih Limited And Others vs The State Of Himachal Pradesh And Others on 25 February, 2016 cites

Oil & Natural Gas Corpn.Ltd vs Western Geco International Ltd on 4 September, 2014

error committed by the Arbitral Tribunal. The challenge to the award is beyond the scope of the parameters of Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The law laid down by the Hon'ble of Apex Court in Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited v. Western Geco International Limited, (2014) rt 9 SCC 263, Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. v. Saw Pipes Ltd, (2003) 5 SCC 705 and Mcdermott International Inc. v. Burn Standard Co. Ltd. and others, (2006) 11 SCC 181 is not at all attracted to the given facts and circumstances of this case, as the Arbitral Tribunal has conducted the arbitral proceedings upon a reference of the Court and in the said order/reference there was specific direction to the Arbitral Tribunal to return the findings.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 300 - T S Thakur - Full Document

Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd vs Saw Pipes Ltd on 17 April, 2003

error committed by the Arbitral Tribunal. The challenge to the award is beyond the scope of the parameters of Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The law laid down by the Hon'ble of Apex Court in Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited v. Western Geco International Limited, (2014) rt 9 SCC 263, Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. v. Saw Pipes Ltd, (2003) 5 SCC 705 and Mcdermott International Inc. v. Burn Standard Co. Ltd. and others, (2006) 11 SCC 181 is not at all attracted to the given facts and circumstances of this case, as the Arbitral Tribunal has conducted the arbitral proceedings upon a reference of the Court and in the said order/reference there was specific direction to the Arbitral Tribunal to return the findings.
Supreme Court of India Cites 78 - Cited by 1413 - Full Document

Mcdermott International Inc vs Burn Standard Co. Ltd. & Ors on 12 May, 2006

error committed by the Arbitral Tribunal. The challenge to the award is beyond the scope of the parameters of Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The law laid down by the Hon'ble of Apex Court in Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited v. Western Geco International Limited, (2014) rt 9 SCC 263, Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. v. Saw Pipes Ltd, (2003) 5 SCC 705 and Mcdermott International Inc. v. Burn Standard Co. Ltd. and others, (2006) 11 SCC 181 is not at all attracted to the given facts and circumstances of this case, as the Arbitral Tribunal has conducted the arbitral proceedings upon a reference of the Court and in the said order/reference there was specific direction to the Arbitral Tribunal to return the findings.
Supreme Court of India Cites 48 - Cited by 1325 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Associate Builders vs Delhi Development Authority on 25 November, 2014

In Associates Builders v. Delhi of Development Authority 2014 (14) Scale, 226, the Apex Court has held that when the Court applied rt the "public policy" test to an arbitration award, should not act as a Court of appeal to correct the errors of fact, if any. A possible view of the matter taken by the Arbitrator on the basis of the evidence available on record should not be interfered with.
Supreme Court of India Cites 55 - Cited by 2182 - R F Nariman - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next