Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.32 seconds)Section 457 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 511 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
State Of Chhattisgarh vs D.R.Gurupanch 13 Mcc/571/2019 ... on 21 August, 2019
It was further observed that it is a well
settled principle of criminal jurisprudence that the more serious
ASHISH Digitally
by ASHISH
signed
State Vs. Padmesh Kumar @ Santosh Yadav KUMAR Date:
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Mahesh & Anr vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 13 September, 2011
MEENA 15:36:04
+05'30'
Page 9 of 12
complainant made a PCR call regarding attempt to commit theft
and the fact that they have apprehended the accused. Thus, it is
proved that the accused was caught red handed at the spot. Hence,
the possibility of framing him in a false case by the police officials
is ruled out. Furthermore, it is a settled law that only because of
fact that because of non-production of several number of
witnesses, the statement of eye witnesses should be thrown away
if otherwise that statement seems reliable and trustworthy. Further,
there is no material contradiction, variation in the cross-
examination of both eye witnesses. This Court has no reason to
disbelieve the testimonies of the said witnesses. This Court also
places its reliance on Mahesh and another Vs. State of Madhya
Pradesh 2011(X) AD (SC) 225, where Hon'ble Supreme Court of
India has held as under: -
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Rai Sandeep @ Deepu vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 7 August, 2012
In this regard Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in case titled as Rai
Sandeep @ Deepu v. State, (2012) 8 SCC 21 has held as under