Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.20 seconds)Article 32 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
United Air Travel Services Through Its ... vs Union Of India Ministry Of External ... on 7 May, 2018
6. Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the
mindless action of the respondents for having applied the statute supra
wrongly to the case of the petitioner pertaining to the paper in question
inasmuch as compelling the petitioner to reappear in the examination
again disregarding the marks secured by the petitioner in the paper in
question after re-evaluation / re-checking is apparent and the petitioner
thus cannot be left remediless and the very grounds noticed in the
preceding paragraphs, therefore, necessitates that the petitioner be
compensated by payment of damages in Public Law on the basis of the
principles laid down by the Apex Court in a series of judgements
including in case titled as United Air Travel Services v. Union of India
reported in (2018) 8 SCC 141 wherein at paragraph 14 following has been
observed:
Smt. Nilabati Behera Alias Lalit Behera ... vs State Of Orissa And Ors on 24 March, 1993
In Nilabati Behera v. State of Orissa, it was
observed that public law proceedings serve a different purpose than
private law proceedings. In that context, it was observed as under:
1