Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.33 seconds)Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 15 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Mrs. Maneka Gandhi vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr. on 25 January, 1978
14 The concept of equality as envisaged under Articles 14, 15 and 16 of
the Constitution has been enunciated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in a number
of cases, starting from Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru, (1973) 4 SCC 1461
and others v. State of Kerala and another and Maneka Gandhi v. Union of
India, (1978) 1 SCC 248. Making appointments to Government service by way of
direct recruitment, without inviting applications and providing opportunity to
eligible candidates, amounts to denial of equal opportunity to persons similarly
situated." The State being well aware of its solemn constitutional obligation to
ensure to the citizens of this Country equality of status and of opportunity as
envisaged in the preamble of the Constitution of India as well as State Constitution
and explicit in Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution which give a constitutional
dictate to the State not to deny to any person equality before law and to ensure that
there is equality of opportunity to all citizens in the matters relating to employment
or appointment to any office under the State, has been consistently acting in a
manner which is tantamount to denial of such equality of status or equality of
WP(C )926/2026 & other connected matters.
Ashwani Kumar & Ors vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 16 December, 1996
19 The Supreme Court analysed its various decisions on the point
rendered in Ashwani Kumar and Ors. Vs. State of Bihar and Ors., 1997 (2)
SCC 1, State of Haryana and Ors vs., Piara Singh and Ors. 1992 (4) SCC 118,
Dharwad Distt.
State Of Haryana And Ors. Etc. Etc vs Piara Singh And Ors. Etc. Etc on 12 August, 1992
46. Learned Senior Counsel for some of the respondents argued that 2026:JKLHC-SGR:151-DB
on the basis of the doctrine of legitimate expectation, the employees,
especially of the Commercial Taxes Department, should be directed
to be regularized since the decisions in Dharwad (supra), Piara Singh
(supra), Jacob, and Gujarat Agricultural University and the like, have
given rise to an expectation in them that their services would also be
regularized.
The Dharwad Distt. P.W.D. Literate ... vs State Of Karnataka & Ors. Etc on 23 February, 1990
P.W.D. Literate Daily Wage Employees Association and Ors.
Vs. State of Karnataka and Ors., 1990 (2) SCC 396, State of Himachal
Pradesh vs. Suresh Kumar Verma and Anr., AIR 1996 SC 1565, State of
Punjab vs. Surinder Kumar and Ors., AIR 1992 SC 1593, and B.N. Nagarajan
WP(C )926/2026 & other connected matters.
State Of Himachal Pradesh vs Suresh Kumar Verma & Aar on 24 January, 1996
P.W.D. Literate Daily Wage Employees Association and Ors.
Vs. State of Karnataka and Ors., 1990 (2) SCC 396, State of Himachal
Pradesh vs. Suresh Kumar Verma and Anr., AIR 1996 SC 1565, State of
Punjab vs. Surinder Kumar and Ors., AIR 1992 SC 1593, and B.N. Nagarajan
WP(C )926/2026 & other connected matters.
B.N. Nagarajan And Ors. vs State Of Karnataka And Ors. on 3 May, 1979
and Ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and Ors., 1979 (4) SCC 507 and numerous
2026:JKLHC-SGR:151-DB
others and arrived at its conclusions thus: