Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.45 seconds)Section 25F in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Article 136 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 25 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
R.T. Rangachari vs Secretary Of State on 19 December, 1933
In the present case the employment ceased,
concluded, ended on the expiration of nine days
automatically may be, but cessation all the same. That to
write into the order of appointment the date of termination
confers no moksha from s.25F(b) is inferable from the
proviso to s. 25F(1). True, the section speaks of
retrenchment by the employer and it is urged that some act
of volition by the employer to bring about the termination
is essential to attract s. 25F and automatic extinguishment
of service by effluxion of time cannot be sufficient. An
English case R. v. Secretary of State(l) was relied on where
Lord Denning MR observed:
The Union Of India And Ors. vs Hafiz Mohd. Said, Delhi And Ors. on 17 August, 1973
(1) Union of India v. Hafiz Mohd. Said: ILR [1973] II
Delhi 673, 676.
1