Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.26 seconds)Section 2A in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 18 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
The Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946
Krishnan And Anr. vs The East India Distilleries And Sugar ... on 17 July, 1963
"In the case of Krishnan v. East India Distilleries and Sugar Factories Ltd., Bellikuppam (supra), the learned Single Judge of the Madras High Court has held that the jurisdiction of the Civil Court is ousted impliedly to try a case which could form subject-matter of an industrial dispute collectively between the workmen and their employer. One of us (Alagiriswami, J.)
Section 80 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Madura Mills Company Ltd. vs Guruvammal And Anr. on 2 September, 1966
as the Judge of the Madras High Court in the case of Madura Mills Co. Ltd. v. Guruvammal (supra), has pointed out that the Act creates a special machinery under Section 33-C(2) to enforce specially created rights. The arties could not, therefore, approach the ordinary Civil Court. We affirm the aforesaid two decisions of the Madras High Court..."
Workmen Of M/S Hindustan Lever Ltd. & Ors vs Management Of M/S Hindusian Lever Ltd on 5 January, 1984
In Workmen of Hindustan Lever Ltd. v. Hindustan Lever Ltd.,(1984-I-LLJ-388) the Apex Court was considering the question as to whether a demand for confirmation of employees in an acting capacity in a grade is an industrial dispute. Since the demand involved both classification of the employees and classification by grade and not merely for promotion and the expression "terms or conditions of employment" would ordinarily include not only contractual terms and conditions, but those terms which are understood and applied by the parties in practice or habitually or by common consent without even being incorporated in the contract and consequently it would be an industrial dispute.
Section 9 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
General Secretary, National And ... vs I. Kannan And Ors. on 27 March, 1978
In General Secretary, National and Grindlays Bank Employees Union v. Kannan and Ors. (1978-I-LLJ-453), a learned single Judge of this Court held that an agreement between the Bank and the union is not a settlement under Section 2(q) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and when the employees seek to enforce, is a validly entered contract between them and the employer, the jurisdiction of the Civil Court cannot be said to have been ousted. The said view was taken in the light of the decision of the learned Judge that he was unable to hold that the right which the plaintiffs wanted to enforce in that case before the civil Court was one recognised and enforceable only under the Industrial Disputes Act, though it is seen that the declaration sought for therein was that the seniority of the workers concerned was to be based on the total number of years of service put in by them in both the banks and the settlement reached between the Bank and the Union was not binding on them.