Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.41 seconds)

Smt. Umapati Devi vs Union Of India And 3 Others on 24 September, 2019

1. Mr. Vishveshwar Mani Tripathi, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, his client has applied for re-issue of passport on application dated 9th June, 2022. Copy of the online application receipt is at page no.13 (annexure no.1). In spite thereof, the passport has not been reissued. This is purportedly because criminal cases are pending, in which his client is involved. He relies on order dated 25th June, 2024 of another coordinate Bench in Writ-C no.5587 of 2024 (Umapati Vs. Union of India through Secretary Ministry of External Affairs New Delhi and three others), paragraph 7. The paragraph is reproduced below.
Allahabad High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vinay Kumar Rajbhar vs Union Of India And Another on 21 July, 2023

5. The view as was taken by co-ordinate Bench covers petitioner's claim in the writ petition. Concerned respondent as may be respondent nos.2 & 3 or any other is directed to forthwith deal with the application of petitioner, for reissue of passport in terms of Pawan Kumar Rajbhar (supra). In event the application is to be rejected, petitioner must be informed of the reasons within four weeks of communication of certified copy of this order. It goes without saying, otherwise the passport must be reissued within aforesaid period.
Allahabad High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - S K Rai - Full Document
1