Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.21 seconds)

The Gita Education Society, Delhi vs Ito, Exemption Ward, Ghaziabad on 22 May, 2019

9. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material available on record. The issue in the present ground is with respect to the addition of Rs.1,46,000/-. It is the case of the revenue that from 292 students who were studying in class 9 th and 10th, Assessee had charged fees @ Rs.2500/- from each student but had accounted for the fees at Rs.2000/- from each student. To support the addition, AO had relied on the statement of Hema Dang, Accountant of the Society. We find that to support the assessee's contentions that the fee that has been charged to have been accounted for and there is no unaccounted fee, assessee had placed various details before the authorities but we find there is no finding of the authorities on the evidences furnished by the assessee to demonstrate the contention of the assessee being wrong. We find that the addition has been made on the basis of the statement of the accounted recorded u/s 133A of the Act. It is a settled law that statement recorded during the survey operation u/s 133A of the Act may be a relevant material ITA No.5228//Del/2019 Lahoria Education Society vs. ITO(E) 6 but in the absence of further materials to substantiate it, the statement recorded u/s 133A of the Act could not be the basis for making addition. Considering the totality of the aforesaid facts, we are of the view that the AO was not justified in making the addition. We therefore direct its deletion. Thus the ground of assessee is allowed.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi Cites 23 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1