Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.25 seconds)Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Babita Prasad And Ors. vs State Of Bihar And Ors. on 8 December, 1992
But, that cannot tantamount to
an appointment.”
[5] (1994) 1 SCC 126 at pg 129 “8. “It is now well settled that a person
who is selected does not, on account of being empanelled alone, acquire any
indefeasible right of appointment. Empanelment is at the best a condition
of eligibility for purposes of appointment, and by itself does not amount
to selection or create a vested right to be appointed unless relevant
service rule says to the contrary. (See Shankarsan Dash v. Union of India
and Sabita Prasad and Ors. v. State in Bihar and Ors”
Article 232 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 236 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Satya Narain Singh Etc. Etc vs The High Court Of Judicatureat ... on 27 November, 1984
9. The respondents relied upon two judgments of this Court in a bid to
sustain the judgment under appeal, Satya Narain Singh Vs. High Court of
Judicature at Allahabad and Others (1985) 1 SCC 225 and Deepak Aggarwal Vs.
Keshav Kaushik and Others (2013) 5 SCC 277.
Bar Council Of India Rules
Prafulla Kumar Swain Etc. Etc vs Prakash Chandra Misra And Ors on 18 January, 1993
11) In my view, there lies a subtle distinction between the words
“selection" and "appointment” in service jurisprudence. (See : Prafulla
Kumar Swain vs. Prakash Chandra Misra & Ors., (1993) Supp. (3) SCC 181).
Shankarsan Dash vs Union Of India on 30 April, 1991
But, that cannot tantamount to
an appointment.”
[5] (1994) 1 SCC 126 at pg 129 “8. “It is now well settled that a person
who is selected does not, on account of being empanelled alone, acquire any
indefeasible right of appointment. Empanelment is at the best a condition
of eligibility for purposes of appointment, and by itself does not amount
to selection or create a vested right to be appointed unless relevant
service rule says to the contrary. (See Shankarsan Dash v. Union of India
and Sabita Prasad and Ors. v. State in Bihar and Ors”
1