Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.33 seconds)V. C. Shukla vs State Through C.B.I on 7 December, 1979
In view of the decisions in "V. C. Shukla Vs. State"
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 468 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 471 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 451 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Amar Nath And Others vs State Of Haryana & Others on 29 July, 1977
In "Amar Nath & Ors. Vs. State of Haryana", AIR
1997 SC 2185, the Hon'ble Apex Court was pleased to elaborate
the term "interlocutory order" appearing in Section 397 Cr.PC. It
was laid down in this case that interlocutory orders must be those
which decide the rights and liabilities of the parties which are
purely interim or temporary in nature and do not decide or touch
the important rights or liabilities of the parties.
Anisa Begum vs Masoom Ali And Ors. on 8 November, 1985
10. "Anisa Begum Vs. Masoom Ali & Ors", 30 (1986)
DLT 107, is the direct authority on the issue in question. In this
case, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court, observed that order u/s 451
Cr.PC is essentially interlocutory in nature since the order
dismissing the superdari application did not decide the rights of
the parties and was an interlocutory order against which no
revision would lie.
1