Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.35 seconds)
Sri Ashis Das vs The State Of Tripura on 6 March, 2017 cites

Hindustan Paper Corpn vs Purnendu Chakrobarty & Ors on 30 October, 1996

36. It was in this context argued for the Respondent that the employer in the present case had given ample opportunity to the employee by giving him warnings, asking him to improve and even extended his probation twice and this was not a case of unfairness and this Court should not interfere. It is true that where the employee had been given suitable warnings, requested to improve, or where he was given a long rope by way of extension of probation, this Court has said that the termination orders cannot be held to be punitive. Hindustan Paper Corporation vs. Purendu Chakraborty : (1996) 11 SCC 404.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 36 - Full Document

M/S. Oswal Pressure Die Casting ... vs Presiding Officer & Anr on 20 February, 1998

(4) SCC 609 and a labour case Oswal Pressure Die Carting Industry vs. Presiding Officer : (1998) 3 SCC 225. But in all these cases, the orders were simple orders of termination which did not contain any words amounting to stigma. In case we come to the conclusion that there is stigma in the impugned order, we cannot ignore the effect it will have on the probationer's future whatever be earlier W.P.(C) No.36 of 2017 Page 11 of 14 [12] opportunities granted by the respondent organisation to the appellant to improve.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 39 - Full Document
1   2 Next