Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.30 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 7 in Employees Provident Funds Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 [Entire Act]
Food Corporation Of India vs Provident Fund Commissioner And Anr on 26 October, 1989
In
support counsel for the petitioner had placed reliance on a
decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Food
Corporation of India V. Provident Fund Commissioner
W.P.(c) No.34628/2011 -7-
and others (1989 (II) LLN 987). It is held therein that the
Commissioner should exercise all powers to collect all the
evidence and collect all materials before coming to proper a
conclusion, which is the legal duty of the Commissioner. It
will be a failure to exercise the jurisdiction, particularly
when a party to the proceedings requests for summoning of
evidence from any particular person. On the facts of the
said case the employer urged that the contractors are in
possession of the relevant lists and the Commissioners had
not given notice to contractors nor made them parties to the
proceedings, inspite of repeated requests. Learned Senior
counsel contended that an exactly identical situation
prevails in the case at hand. Hence it is contended that
there is clear denial of natural justice in arriving
determination of contribution payable.
Section 7Q in Employees Provident Funds Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 [Entire Act]
Section 14B in Employees Provident Funds Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 [Entire Act]
The Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952
1