Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.29 seconds)Food Corporation Of India Staff Union vs Food Corporation Of India And Ors on 17 February, 1995
In the light of the above I am of the view that since this petition affects a critical establishment supplying power to the National Capital Territory of Delhi and for the last 20 years there has been no determination of the status of the major union leading to proliferation of trade unions, it would be not only in the interest of justice but also in the public interest as well as industrial peace and harmony, that the character of majority union be ascertained as per the (procedure) laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court since almost 20 years have passed without such determination. It is of utmost importance that this be done expeditiously because any industrial unrest would affect the power supply and a prolonged industrial dispute adjudication may have the potential of vitiating industrial peace and harmony. No useful purpose would be served by reference of a dispute for adjudication after more than 20 years particularly when the issue being referred is fully covered by the Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
Bombay Telephone Canteen Employees' ... vs Union Of India & Anr on 9 July, 1997
In fact the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Bombay Telephone Canteen Employees Association Vs. Union of India has held that insofar as the employees of Corporations are concerned a remedy either under Article 226 of the Constitution of India or a reference under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act is available. The respondent No.3 is under the administrative control of the National Thermal Power Corporation,
which is a Corporation envisaged by the above judgment. It is evident that this ought to be done expeditiously in the interest of industrial peace.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 10 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
1