Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.31 seconds)
Syed Ahmed Alias Golu Sayed Azam And ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And Another on 7 May, 2026
cites
The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Laxmi Narayan on 5 March, 2019
11. For above reasons, facts in the instant case as well as the facts
in above referred cases are distinguishable. Another important aspect
that needs to be dealt is that, the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in
The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan (supra) which is
heavily relied, is of 2019, but the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in
the case of Ramgopal (Supra) is of 29.09.2021 and that of
Ramawatar, which is also by Larger Bench, is decided on 25.10.2021
and as such, it is subsequent to the judgment in the case of The State
of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan (supra) and in both these
judgments, compounding of non-compoundable offence by invoking
Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been endorsed.
Section 307 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 320 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 306 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Ramgopal & Anr vs State Of M.P.& Anr on 30 July, 2010
11. For above reasons, facts in the instant case as well as the facts
in above referred cases are distinguishable. Another important aspect
that needs to be dealt is that, the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in
The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan (supra) which is
heavily relied, is of 2019, but the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in
the case of Ramgopal (Supra) is of 29.09.2021 and that of
Ramawatar, which is also by Larger Bench, is decided on 25.10.2021
and as such, it is subsequent to the judgment in the case of The State
of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan (supra) and in both these
judgments, compounding of non-compoundable offence by invoking
Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been endorsed.
Ramawatar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 25 October, 2021
17. Therefore, in the light of above discussion, law laid down by
the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Ramgopal (supra), Ramawatar
(supra) and the judgments of this Court in above referred appeals,
this Court is convinced that amicable settlement/compromise is
genuine and therefore, Court is inclined to grant the prayers. Hence,
following order :
Surindra Nath Mohanthy And Anr vs State Of Orissa on 4 May, 1999
In the case of Surendra Nath Mohanty (supra), the Hon'ble
Apex Court had refused to compound offence under Section 326 of
IPC but had reduced the sentence to already undergone.
M.P.State Tourism Dev.Corpn. vs Laxmi Narayan &Ors.; on 27 April, 2015
5 SCC 238; The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan and
others [Criminal Appeal No. 349 of 2019 with connected appeal
decided on 05.03.2019] ; Ramgopal and another v. The State of
Madhya Pradesh [Criminal Appeal No. 1489 of 2012 with connected
appeal decided on 29.09.2021] ; as well as in the case of Daxaben v.
State of Gujarat and others [Criminal Appeal arising out of SLP (Cri)
No. 1132-1155 of 2022 decided on 29.07.2022] and lastly, the
judgment of this Court in the case of Ganesh Baban Nimse and others
v. State of Maharashtra [Criminal Appeal No. 306 of 2023 with
connected appeals decided by this Court on 04.02.2026].