Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (1.52 seconds)Cce And St Bangalore Ltu vs M/S Abb Ltd on 4 October, 2019
(iii) C.C.E. & S.T., Bangalore v. ABB Ltd., Vadodara [2011-
TIOL-395-HC-KAR-ST];
Commissioner Of Customs Central Excise ... vs M/S. Deloitte Support Services India ... on 15 December, 2014
(v) C.C.E., Hyderabad-IV v. Deloitte Tax Services India Pvt.
Ltd. [2008 (11) S.T.R. 266 (Tri. - Bang.)];
Abb Ltd vs Commissioner Of Central ... on 16 October, 2017
(vi) ABB Ltd. v. C.C.E. & S.T., Bangalore [2009 (15) S.T.R.
23 (Tri. - LB)];
M/S Affinity Express India Pvt. Ltd vs Commissioner Of Central Excise, Pune-I on 22 July, 2014
III [2016 (6) T.M.I. 447 - CESTAT Chennai]
5.2.3 He further contended, without prejudice to his
other contentions, that the Revenue has only denied the
refund in respect of the above services without
questioning the eligibility, but for want of nexus and in
this regard, he relied on the decision of the Mumbai
Bench of the Tribunal in the case of M/s. Affinity Express
India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commr. of Central Excise, Pune-I
reported in 2015-TIOL-1778-CESTAT-MUM.
M/S. Murugappa Morgan Thermal Ceramics ... vs Commissioner Of Central Excise, ... on 30 March, 2016
This issue was dealt with by the Ahmedabad Bench
of the Tribunal in the case of M/s. Murugappa
Morgan Thermal Ceramics Ltd. v. Commissioner of
Central Excise, Ahmedabad-III [2013 (4) T.M.I.
384 - CESTAT Ahmedabad] wherein the Tribunal
held that the appellant was required to maintain a
garden which is an obligation under the relevant
pollution control law and CENVAT Credit with
respect to the services used for maintaining the
garden would therefore be admissible.
M/S Hsbc Software Development (India) ... vs Commissioner Of Central Excise, ... on 8 August, 2014
The above service was held to be an eligible input
service by the Mumbai Bench of the Tribunal in
M/s. PTC Softwares (India) Pvt. Ltd. v.
Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune-III [2014
(35) S.T.R. 632 (Tri. - Mum.)] stating that car
parking is part of the business premises of the
appellant and is a business expenditure.
Adc India Communications Ltd vs The Commissioner Of Central Excise on 27 April, 2012
The Bangalore Bench of the Tribunal in the case of
M/s. ADC India Communication Ltd. v.
Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore [2012
(12) T.M.I. 388 - CESTAT Bangalore] has held that
Annual Maintenance Contract (AMC) has nexus with
manufacture of products and also that AMC for
computers are used for manifold purposes in
connection with manufacture and clearance of
products. In view of the above requisite nexus, the
Bench held that the assessee was entitled to take
credit of the Service Tax paid.
Commissioner Of Service Tax-Iii vs M/S.Reed Elsevier Private Limited on 27 April, 2017
(ii) C.S.T.-III, Chennai v. Reed Elsevier Pvt. Ltd. [2018 (8)
G.S.T.L. 355 (Mad.)];
Kirloskar Sytems Ltd vs Commissioner Of Service Tax - ... on 20 February, 2014
The above services can be comfortably clubbed
under 'Maintenance Charges' and are covered by
the decision of the Bangalore Bench of the Tribunal
in M/s. Kirloskar Systems Ltd. v. Commissioner of
Service Tax, Bangalore [2014 (35) S.T.R. 552 (Tri.
1