Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.37 seconds)
Issac.K.J vs Superintendent on 23 January, 2017 cites

M.A. Mohanan vs The Senior Supdt. Of Post Offices And ... on 3 November, 1999

They both ie., GDS on one hand and Postman/Group D on the other belong to two different services viz., Regular Postal Service and Extra Departmental Postal Service (GDS) as brought out by the Full Bench order of Tribunal in O.A.No.807/1999 M.A.Mohanan Vs. Senior Superintendent of Post Offices & Others and reiterated by Apex Court in Najithamol's case. Hence the appointment of GDS to any departmental post, be it Postman/Group D/Postal Assistant can only be said to be by way of direct recruitment and not promotion.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 2 - Cited by 47 - Full Document

Y.Najithamol & Ors vs Soumya S.D.& Ors on 12 August, 2016

The status of GDS pronounced by the Apex Court in Najithamol's case (supra), from wherein the Apex Court has drawn its conclusion on confirming OBC reservation to the posts of Postman, as the appointment is by direct recruitment, helps us to draw the conclusion that appointment of GDS to Group D, a regular Government service, is direct recruitment. Hence applicants' prayer for appointment to abolished direct recruitment posts cannot be sustained.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 104 - V G Gowda - Full Document

Superintendent Of Post Offices Etc. Etc vs P.K. Rajamma Etc. Etc on 22 April, 1977

. Promotion to a post, thus, can only happen when the promotional post and the post being promoted from are a part of the same class of service. Gramin Dak Sevak is a civil post, but it is not a part of the regular service of the Postal Department.' The Apex Court further went on to quote the three Judge Bench order in the case of the Superintendent of Post Offices and others vs. P.K.Rajamma (1977) 3 SCC 94 :
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 139 - A C Gupta - Full Document

C. C. Padmanabhan & Others vs The Director Of Public Instructions And ... on 30 July, 1980

Further, Hon'ble Supreme Court in C.C.Padmanabhan and Ors. Vs. Director of Public Instructions and Ors., 1980 (Suppl.) SCC 668 : 1981(1) SLJ 165 (SC), observed that 'Promotion' as understood in ordinary parlance and also as a term frequently used in cases involving service laws means that a person already holding a position would have a promotion if he is appointed to another post which satisfies either of the two conditions namely that the new post is in higher category of the same service or class. Applying the above criteria appointment as Postman from EDA cannot be termed as promotion as the posts of Postman and EDA belong to two different services viz. regular Postal Service' and 'Extra Departmental Postal Service.' (emphasis laid by this Court)
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 181 - A D Koshal - Full Document
1