Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.30 seconds)Section 40 in The Copyright Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Section 51 in The Copyright Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Larsen & Toubro Limited vs Chagan Bhai Patel on 9 January, 2009
In Larsen and Toubro Limited v. Chagan Bhai
Patel MIPR 2009 (1) 194, this Court observed that it would
be encouraging the violators of intellectual property, if the
defendants notwithstanding having not contested the suit
are not burdened with punitive damages.
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Time Incorporated vs Lokesh Srivastava And Anr. on 3 January, 2005
20. Learned counsel for the plaintiff states that he is
confining his prayers to grant of permanent injunction and
punitive damages. Regarding punitive damages in the case
of Time Incorporated v. Lokesh Srivastava & Anr., 2005
(30) PTC 3 (Del), this Court observed that punitive damages
are founded on the philosophy of corrective justice and as
such, in appropriate cases these must be awarded to give a
signal to the wrong doers that the law does not take a
breach merely as a matter between rival parties but feels
concerned about those also who are not party to the lis but
suffer on account of the breach.
Section 14 in The Copyright Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Section 32 in The Copyright Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Copyright Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Hero Honda Motors Ltd. vs Shree Assuramji Scooters on 29 November, 2005
In the case of Hero Honda
Motors Ltd. v. Shree Assuramji Scooters, 2006 (32) PTC
117 (Del), this Court noticing that the defendant had chosen
to stay away from the proceedings of the Court felt that in
such case punitive damages need to be awarded, since
otherwise the defendant, who appears in the Court and
submits its account books would be liable for damages
whereas a party which chooses to stay away from the Court
proceedings would escape the liability on account of the
failure of the availability of account books.