Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.80 seconds)Union Of India & Anr vs S.K. Goel & Ors on 12 February, 2007
19. Considering the Hon'ble Apex Court rulings in Union of India
and Anr. v. S.K. Goel and Others (AIR 2007 SC 1199), it should be
SHAINEY VIJU
SHAINECAT
BANGALORE
Y VIJU 2026.01.28
10:52:48+05'30'
43
O.A.No.170/373/2024/CAT/BANGALORE
clear that there is limited scope for judicial review and interpretation
of the recommendations of the DPC, which consists of multiple
experts from the said department. In this particular case, there were
five experts in the DPC. We can find that the DPC has gone into the
relevant years' APARs of all the officials who were in the zone of
consideration, and they have rightly and justifiably considered all the
entries in the APAR and, after overall assessment of the entries which
were recorded by multiple officers (one reporting officer and two
reviewing officers who had given adverse entries and the said adverse
entries had not been expunged even after challenge and have become
final after no further challenge). The DPC has come to a certain
decision about considering the applicant unfit for the said year
promotion, and we do not find any valid ground to interfere with the
said decision.
S.T. Ramesh vs State Of Karnataka & Anr on 20 February, 2007
We have gone through the said judgment. The facts and issues
of the said case are very different from the case in hand.
The Administrative Tribunal Act, 1965
1