Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 278 (2.19 seconds)
Akhil Bhartiya Mangela Samaj Parishad vs Maharashtra Pollution Control Board ... on 24 January, 2022
cites
The Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957
The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980
The Water (Prevention And Control Of Pollution) Act, 1974
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986
T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad vs Union Of India & Ors on 6 July, 2011
With regard to the meaning of the term
'forest', Court relied on the judgment in T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad
vs Union of India & Others (1997)2SCC267 and held that definition of
forest cannot be read in a restrictive manner. In the conclusions recorded
in para 215, Court said that crushing of stones etc., does not result into a
new commodity different from forest produce, the crust materials
continue to be stone and retain their nature of forest produce. Similar is
the position with regard to coal marbles etc.
M.C. Mehta vs Union Of India & Ors on 18 March, 2004
In M.C. Mehta v. Union
of India (1987) Supp. SCC 131, certain directions were issued by this
Court regarding hazardous chemicals. Relying partly on Article 21, it
was observed that life, public health and ecology are priority and
cannot be lost sight of over employment and loss of revenue.