Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (0.32 seconds)

Salwan Construction Co. vs Union Of India on 10 May, 1977

In Salwan Constructions Co. v. Union of India , it was observed by the Delhi High Court that "Repeal" connotes the abrogation of one Act by another, whereas "amendment" of a statute means an alteration in law leaving some part of the original still standing. Section 276B has been amended so as not to treat failure to deduct as a serious offence. Also there is no savings clause to initiate proceedings under the old section, after it has been amended/omitted. Hence complaints filed after the amendment to Section 276B are not maintainable.
Delhi High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Nirmal Kumar Khandelwal vs Union Of India And Ors on 1 May, 1978

In Narendra Kumar Khandelwal v. Union of India , it was held by the Madhya Pradesh High Court that though the complaints under Section 276B were filed in March, 1987 when failure to deduct was an offence, still the judgment of the trial Court was delivered in April, 1996 when failure to deduct was not an offence. Hence the complaints were quashed since omission results in bringing halt to all actions under the omitted provision of the Act.
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 26 - R S Sarkaria - Full Document
1   2 Next