Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 44 (0.43 seconds)

Manzar Sayeed Khan vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr on 5 April, 2007

10. The gist of the offence under Section 153-A IPC is the intention to promote feelings of enmity or hatred between different classes of people. The intention has to be judged primarily by the language of the piece of writing and the circumstances in which it was written and published. The matter complained of within the ambit of Section 153- A must be read as a whole. One cannot rely on strongly worded and isolated passages for proving the charge nor indeed can one take a sentence here and a sentence there and connect them by a meticulous process of inferential reasoning [Manzar Sayeed Khan v. State of Maharashtra, (2007) 5 SCC 1)."
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 61 - L S Panta - Full Document

Life Insurance Corpn. Of India And Ors. ... vs Prof. Manubhai D. Shah Etc. Etc on 22 July, 1992

44. Every free citizen has a freedom to air one's views. Every citizen has an undoubted right to express his views. Freedom to air one's views is the lifeline of any democratic institution. Any attempt to stifle, suffocate or gag this right would sound a death-knell to democracy and would help usher in autocracy or dictatorship, as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Manubhai D. Shah (2 supra). The Hon'ble Apex Court 48 Dr.GRR,J WP No.36994 of 2017&Batch always placed a broad interpretation on the value and content of Article 19(1)(a), making it subject only to the restrictions permissible under Article 19(2).
Supreme Court of India Cites 28 - Cited by 77 - A M Ahmadi - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next