Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.39 seconds)Section 106 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Shivaji Chintappa Patil vs The State Of Maharashtra on 2 March, 2021
28. Recently, the Honourable Supreme Court following the above said
judgments in Shivaji Chintoppa Patil v. State of Maharashtra reported in
(2021) 2 SCC (Cri) 679, has held as follows:
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda vs State Of Maharashtra on 17 July, 1984
31. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in a leading case of circumstantial
evidence, in Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra [(1984) 4
SCC 116] held as follows:
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 103 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Smt. Gargi vs State Of Haryana And Others on 25 August, 2009
25.The Honourable Supreme Court in Smt. Gargi vs. State of Haryana
reported in (2019) 9 SCC 738, has held as follows:
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Satpal Singh vs State Of Haryana on 28 July, 2010
27. The Honourable Supreme Court in Satpal vs. State of Haryana
reported in (2018) 6 SCC page 610, has held as follows:
1